Hepatic Fibrosis, Inflammation, and Steatosis: Influence on the MR Viscoelastic and Diffusion Parameters in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease.

Purpose To determine the relationship of liver fibrosis, inflammation, and steatosis with the magnetic resonance (MR) viscoelastic and diffusion parameters in patients with chronic liver disease and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the imaging parameters in staging liver fibrosis. Materials and Methods Consecutive patients with chronic liver disease scheduled for liver biopsy were prospectively recruited from November 2010 to October 2012 for this institutional review board-approved study after they provided written informed consent. Sixty-eight patients underwent three-dimensional MR elastography and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a 1.5-T MR system. Fibrosis, inflammation, and steatosis were assessed with the METAVIR and steatosis, activity, and fibrosis (or SAF) scoring systems. Spearman correlation and multiple regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between liver fibrosis, inflammation, steatosis, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and viscoelastic and diffusion parameters. The accuracy of three-dimensional MR elastography and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the determination of fibrosis stage was assessed with Obuchowski measures. Results At multiple regression analysis, fibrosis was the only variable associated with viscoelastic parameters (ß = 0.6, P < .001, R2 = 0.33 for shear modulus; ß = 0.6, P < .001, R2 = 0.32 for elasticity). Fibrosis had a weaker independent association with the apparent diffusion coefficient (ß = -0.3, P = .02, R2 = 0.33) than did steatosis (ß = -0.5, P < .001, R2 = 0.33). Steatosis was the only factor independently associated with the pure diffusion coefficient (ß = -0.4, P = .002, R2 = 0.22). Inflammation and ALT level were not associated with the viscoelastic or diffusion parameters. The diagnostic accuracy of fibrosis staging was significantly higher when measuring the shear modulus rather than the apparent diffusion coefficient (Obuchowski measures, 0.82 ± 0.04 vs 0.30 ± 0.06; P < .001). Conclusion Fibrosis is independently associated with the MR viscoelastic parameters and is less associated with the diffusion parameters than is steatosis. These results and those of diagnostic accuracy suggest that MR elastography should be preferred over diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the staging of liver fibrosis. © RSNA, 2016.

Efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based therapies in patients with advanced liver disease in a real-life cohort.

BACKGROUND: The combination of sofosbuvir (SOF) with ribavirin (RBV) or daclatasvir (DCV) or simeprevir (SIM) for the treatment of patients infected by chronic hepatitis C (CHC) have led to significantly increased rates of sustained virological response (SVR). However, there is only limited data regarding factors associated with treatment failure in a "real-life" cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients F3-F4 were treated with SOF-based interferon-free therapy in our hospital from November 2013 to July 2015. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with sustained virological response 12 weeks after cessation of therapy (SVR12). RESULTS: A total of 167 treatment-naive and 207 treatment-experienced patients were treated and followed up for 2 years (n=383). Overall, 71% were men; among them, 54% had cirrhosis and the median age was 53 years. SVR12 was achieved by 82% of the patients receiving SOF+RBV, 92% receiving SOF+DCV, and 79% receiving SOF+SIM. Metavir F4 and albumin serum were found as independent risk factors associated with treatment failure in groups receiving SOF+RBV (p=0.008 and p=0.001), SOF+DCV (p=0.038 and p=0.043), and SOF+SIM±RBV (p=0.014 and p=0.017), respectively. The most common adverse events were fatigue, nausea, headache, and anemia. Three patients discontinued the treatment due to an adverse event. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that 12-week SOF-based regimen plus RBV or DCV or SIM is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment in CHC patients with fibrosis stage F3-F4. Patients, who display risk factors for cirrhosis, should be referred to an experienced viral hepatitis center.

Precore/Core promoter variants to predict significant fibrosis in both HBeAg positive and negative chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Assessing fibrosis is essential in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The objective was to investigate the relationship between fibrosis, host and viral factors to identify non-invasive markers of significant fibrosis in a large cohort of unselected, well-characterized, treatment-naïve CHB patients. METHODS: Three hundred and seventy-seven HBsAg-positive patients (97 HBeAg-positive and 280 HBeAg-negative, genotypes A to E) who had liver biopsy were consecutively included. Host and viral factors (ALT, HBsAg and HBV-DNA levels, HBV genotype and precore (PC)/basal core promoter (BCP) variants) were determined on the day of the biopsy. Fibrosis stage was assessed using METAVIR score. RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent of the patients had significant fibrosis (METAVIR F ≥ 2). On univariate analysis, the stages of fibrosis F ≥ 2 were associated with older age (P < 0.0001), male gender (P = 0.01), higher ALT and HBV-DNA levels (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0003, respectively), the presence of BCP (P < 0.0001) and BCP/PC variants (P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, age (P < 0.0001), the presence of HBV variants (P < 0.0001), HBV-DNA level (P = 0.0006) and ALT level (P = 0.02) were independently associated with significant fibrosis. The diagnostic accuracy of the combination (age, ALT, HBV-DNA, HBV variants) in predicting fibrosis F ≥ 2 was evidenced by a c-index of 0.76 (CI 95% 0.71-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: We identified strong independent risk factors (age, ALT, HBV-DNA, HBV variants) predicting significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) independently of HBeAg status in patients with CHB. Patients with BCP variants have a higher risk of severe liver disease. The detection of these mutants may help to predict significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2).

Impact of treatment against hepatitis C virus on overall survival of naive patients with advanced liver disease.

The beneficial effect of achieving a sustained virological response (SVR) after antiviral treatment against hepatitis C virus is well established. However, it remains unclear whether unsuccessful treatment (non-SVR) also improves patient survival, especially in patients with advanced liver fibrosis. We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of death or liver transplantation in the 427 naive patients with a Child-Pugh score of A and advanced fibrosis newly admitted to the Hospital Beaujon between 2000 and 2010. Patients were followed for a median time of 5.5 years. The baseline characteristics of untreated (n=102) and treated (n=325) patients were largely similar, and there was no evidence of a bias of indication. Treated patients received a combination of interferon and ribavirin and had an SVR rate of 32%. The incidence of death or liver transplantation per 100 person-years was 1.00, 3.20, and 5.44 in SVR, non-SVR, and untreated patients, respectively. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, the risk of death or liver transplantation was significantly lower in SVR than in non-SVR patients and in non-SVR than in untreated patients (hazard ratios, 0.35 and 0.51, respectively; P=0.019 and 0.038, respectively). The effect of treatment in non-SVR patients was higher in patients who had a virological or a biochemical response than in those who did not have a virological or a biochemical response. The risk of death or liver transplantation was significantly lower in treated than in untreated patients. Moreover, there was a gradient of mortality between patients with SVRs, virological or biochemical responders, and untreated patients, suggesting that treatment, even in the absence of viral eradication, has a beneficial effect on survival.

Using pharmacokinetic and viral kinetic modeling to estimate the antiviral effectiveness of telaprevir, boceprevir, and pegylated interferon during triple therapy in treatment-experienced hepatitis C virus-infected cirrhotic patients.

Triple therapy combining a protease inhibitor (PI) (telaprevir or boceprevir), pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN), and ribavirin (RBV) has dramatically increased the chance of eradicating hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, the efficacy of this treatment remains suboptimal in cirrhotic treatment-experienced patients. Here, we aimed to better understand the origin of this impaired response by estimating the antiviral effectiveness of each drug. Fifteen HCV genotype 1-infected patients with compensated cirrhosis, who were nonresponders to prior PEG-IFN/RBV therapy, were enrolled in a nonrandomized study. HCV RNA and concentrations of PIs, PEG-IFN, and RBV were frequently assessed in the first 12 weeks of treatment and were analyzed using a pharmacokinetic/viral kinetic model. The two PIs achieved similar levels of molar concentrations (P=0.5), but there was a significant difference in the 50% effective concentrations (EC50) (P=0.008), leading to greater effectiveness for telaprevir than for boceprevir in blocking viral production (99.8% versus 99.0%, respectively, P=0.002). In all patients, the antiviral effectiveness of PEG-IFN was modest (43.4%), and there was no significant contribution of RBV exposure to the total antiviral effectiveness. The second phase of viral decline, which is attributed to the loss rate of infected cells, was slow (0.19 day(-1)) and was higher in patients who subsequently eradicated HCV (P=0.03). The two PIs achieved high levels of antiviral effectiveness. However, the suboptimal antiviral effectiveness of PEG-IFN/RBV and the low loss of infected cells suggest that a longer treatment duration might be needed in cirrhotic treatment-experienced patients and that a future IFN-free regimen may be particularly beneficial in these patients.